Skip to main content

If humans evolved from chimps, why are there still chimps?

If humans evolved from chimps, then why are there still chimps?

Many people think that this is a dumb question, but it is not, it is actually very valid. This is a question that science has not yet come up with a concrete answer for. 

The first thing we must address is the fact that we did not actually evolve from chimpanzees. Humans and chimpanzees both evolved from a common ancestor, so instead of chimps being the "mothers" of humankind so to speak, they are more like cousins to humans. We are closely related, yes, but we have actually been on separate evolutionary paths for around six million years, give or take. Unfortunately, we do not have much information at all on our common ancestor, as fossils have yet to be found. Hopefully, this will change and we will be able to put a face to our ancestor, but for now, we must work with the fossils of early hominids as well as chimpanzee and human DNA. 

Although we did not evolve from chimps, the question still remains: why did we not evolve together? Why did one species evolve to be more complex than the other? Why do humans have bigger brains and bipedal locomotion? 

One somewhat short and simple possibility is that chimpanzees were doing fine just as they were. Perhaps there was just no need for further evolution. Chimpanzees are a highly intelligent group of animals with incredible cognitive mapping abilities, working memories, and perhaps even theory of mind. They have the capability to make, use, and understand tools. Perhaps with the combination of physical and mental capabilities, there was simply no need for further evolution. Going by the Darwinian model of evolution and natural selection, evolution occurs when there is a need for an organism to develop features or habits that will assist in allowing it to thrive in its environment and successfully reproduce. So far, chimps and other apes have been able to thrive in their environments and successfully birth and raise the adorable baby apes that we love to look at so much. 



By saying that chimps had no need for further advancement, it implies that early hominids were flawed. Perhaps they were not as well suited for the environment, encountering things like predators, food shortages, and weather events that prevented them from thriving. In order to preserve themselves, evolution selected to acquire different traits, perhaps even more so when early ancestors began to migrate to different regions of the world. 

Simply put, evolution is not as linear as some people believe it to be, and this is why things such as cladograms exist. I like to think of evolution in terms of a neighborhood. We begin with the entrance to the neighborhood, which represents one of the oldest common ancestors or organisms, Then, every street within the neighborhood is a different evolutionary lineage, and every house on that street a different organism or family of organisms. 

Hopper, L. M. & Brosnan, S. F. (2012) Primat Cognition. Nature Education Knowledge 5(8):3

Warren, Kerryn, et al. “Early Hominins.” Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropolgy, American Anthropological Association, Arlington, VA, 2019, pp. 2–56.






Comments

  1. Nice post! i agree that it isn't a stupid question (though i'd admit that some people do use it as a sort of trap, but i like to think that often it is a genuine question). I like how you take this and look at chimp behavior. We sadly don't really know that much about chimpanzee evolution and do not really know how much evolution occured over the last 7 million years. Maybe chimps are as derived as we are from the last common ancestor? I wonder if there is any info out there on this question? either way, i enjoyed reading this piece. thanks!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

29 May 2020: Decolonizing Paleoanthropology

Dunsworth, Sterling, and Athreya and Ackermann have done great work at bringing to light the issue of colonial mindsets in modern anthropological research in their respective fields and articles. Athreya and Ackermann specifically mention the concept of "otherization," or the process of marginalizing and devaluing concepts having to due with minority populations. This is a word I had never heard about until their article, Colonialism and Narratives of Human Origins in Asia and Africa, and a word that I think is very helpful in explaining the way that minority, or non-white, populations are treated and more specifically the way that their narratives and experiences are put on the back burner to be ignored and forgotten about.  I also believe that it is incredibly unfortunate that many people in science have retained the colonialist mindset without even knowing it. It is something that can be drilled into people, starting when they are kids and continuing throughout their entir

Provide more funding for human evolution studies

Human evolution is an incredibly important subject to be studying, as it helps modern humans understand why their body is shaped in the way that it is and what purpose the many morphological changes serve. The study can also help to humble modern humans and help them remember their place in the world. Although humans dominate and shape the world currently, it has not always been that way and we are lucky to have evolved in the ways that we have. Not only will the knowledge of human evolution educate us about the reasons why our bodies work the way they do, but it will also satisfy the curiosity that people inherently have. People wonder where they come from and how they have gotten to where we are in societal and biological spheres today.  Although there has been lots of research done on the concept of human evolution and this research has produced fascinating results, there is still much work left to be done in the field. For example, there have been so many finds in Africa, but centr