Skip to main content

Frenemies?

For those who are aware that human evolution is not a linear process, but a tree with many different branches and families, it has always been hard to believe that no interactions occurred between two different species of hominin. Currently, there is so much data being released by researchers that prove that there were instances in which two or more hominin species existed in the same place at the same time and they would have interacted. For example, we know that Homo sapiens and Neanderthals have to have interacted and even interbred. We also know, thanks to Herries et al., that Australopithecus, Paranthropus, and Homo erectus all existed together in Drimolen, South Africa between 2.04 and 1.95 million years ago. 

Although we know that they did exist in the same time period, we do not know how their interactions would have gone. I, like many others, believe that they would have been friendly in general, as they had to share the land. With these friendly interactions, it can also be assumed that these species may have interbred and lived in close proximity. Semaw et al. write about the slow transition from Oldowan to Acheulian tools. This example of a slower transition between the types of technology used by hominids could be indicative of how the different species would have taught each other about different methods and tool-making processes. It would not have been a quick transition between technologies, as it would take each group some time to adapt to these new methods. 

Even though I believe they would have been generally friendly with one another, there would also be lots of competition between the groups, as they were having to share land and resources. This could lead to many fights and possibly fatal encounters, as each group was trying to acquire the resources they needed to help themselves and their communities survive. This competition would have been the beginning of the end for certain species of hominins, as the other groups would outcompete them for resources, causing then to struggle to survive. 

Herries, A. I., Martin, J. M., Leece, A. B., Adams, J. W., Boschian, G., Joannes-Boyau, R., . . . Menter, C. (2020). Contemporaneity of Australopithecus, Paranthropus, and early Homo erectus in South Africa. Science, 368(6486). doi:10.1126/science.aaw7293

Semaw, S., Rogers, M. J., Simpson, S. W., Levin, N. E., Quade, J., Dunbar, N., . . . Everett, M. (2020). Co-occurrence of Acheulian and Oldowan artifacts with Homo erectus cranial fossils from Gona, Afar, Ethiopia. Science Advances, 6(10). doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw4694

Comments

  1. Marc KisselJune 22, 2020 at 11:43 AM

    interesting! i like how you bring in the idea of slow transitions. it is hard since we tend to see 'abruptness' in the fossil record and then a lot of stasis, but this is impt to note. Its interesting. i think liek 50 yrs ago lots of folks thought that any interactions between groups would be violent. then there was a pendulum swing back and people were seeing more peacful interactions. but since the 90s or so it has been pretty much the common arguement that warfare and violence was commonplace. SO i like how you factor this in. and we have to remember that even warfare, however awful, is a form of cooperation in some sense cause you have to convince others to go and fight. how we do that is super cultually-laden...great job!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

29 May 2020: Decolonizing Paleoanthropology

Dunsworth, Sterling, and Athreya and Ackermann have done great work at bringing to light the issue of colonial mindsets in modern anthropological research in their respective fields and articles. Athreya and Ackermann specifically mention the concept of "otherization," or the process of marginalizing and devaluing concepts having to due with minority populations. This is a word I had never heard about until their article, Colonialism and Narratives of Human Origins in Asia and Africa, and a word that I think is very helpful in explaining the way that minority, or non-white, populations are treated and more specifically the way that their narratives and experiences are put on the back burner to be ignored and forgotten about.  I also believe that it is incredibly unfortunate that many people in science have retained the colonialist mindset without even knowing it. It is something that can be drilled into people, starting when they are kids and continuing throughout their entir
2 comments
Read more

If humans evolved from chimps, why are there still chimps?

If humans evolved from chimps, then why are there still chimps? Many people think that this is a dumb question, but it is not, it is actually very valid. This is a question that science has not yet come up with a concrete answer for.  The first thing we must address is the fact that we did not actually evolve from chimpanzees. Humans and chimpanzees both evolved from a common ancestor, so instead of chimps being the "mothers" of humankind so to speak, they are more like cousins to humans. We are closely related, yes, but we have actually been on separate evolutionary paths for around six million years, give or take. Unfortunately, we do not have much information at all on our common ancestor, as fossils have yet to be found. Hopefully, this will change and we will be able to put a face to our ancestor, but for now, we must work with the fossils of early hominids as well as chimpanzee and human DNA.  Although we did not evolve from chimps, the question still remains: why did w
1 comment
Read more

Provide more funding for human evolution studies

Human evolution is an incredibly important subject to be studying, as it helps modern humans understand why their body is shaped in the way that it is and what purpose the many morphological changes serve. The study can also help to humble modern humans and help them remember their place in the world. Although humans dominate and shape the world currently, it has not always been that way and we are lucky to have evolved in the ways that we have. Not only will the knowledge of human evolution educate us about the reasons why our bodies work the way they do, but it will also satisfy the curiosity that people inherently have. People wonder where they come from and how they have gotten to where we are in societal and biological spheres today.  Although there has been lots of research done on the concept of human evolution and this research has produced fascinating results, there is still much work left to be done in the field. For example, there have been so many finds in Africa, but centr
1 comment
Read more